Another World is a cultural collective made up of heterogeneous people. We have chosen to remain linked in order to mutually contribute to the realization of an alternative overall vision to the conceptual deviations so dear to the braggart as to the slothful who would like the fate of the communities pre-established to the point of not admitting exceptions to the dominant narrative.
We are free thinkers and researchers convinced that there is not only the vision of the world that someone arrogantly continues to claim is the only possible one. We have in fact learned even before the situation collapsed in recent times, how much and how it is not possible to obtain any truth and any knowledge simply by being satisfied with what is shown to us and what we are taught.
Learning process depends on the paths one takes, often on the drifts that are undertaken or that are sometimes induced. We then dug and reoriented until ours has become a practical sense of adventure: while the world demands that ideas settle and stratify, that they are passively accepted, we prefer to dig, analyze among those sediments, to discover the various shades of distortion of meanings, today deposited as absolute truths of faith when not also science’s dogmas.
Ours is a continuous attempt to distinguish the confusion within what is passed off as an order, to wake up our neighbors and grow with them, while the world continues to sell a lie as truth. And it is precisely together with our travel companions that we have often struggled so much to believe that no one could look beyond their own nose. Thus we continue to witness mass ebetization, while we are asked to indulge pure unacceptable conditions, such as the idea that there is no alternative, that there is no escape in this fatality, if not in the dialectic of resilience and in considering sloth a virtue.
So we prefer to contrast the love of research with the rhetoric of resignation, against the pedagogy of individual flexibility, we prefer the indestructibility of freedom of determination. Something that has always pushed us to consider the present as a starting point and that to the frenzy and frenetic banality we contrast with patience and observation of things, because we are used to the concealment of objectivity, to the fideistic consecration of convenient truth, with which the ether is now full.
We are aware that the world is constantly changing, we have no intention of distancing ourselves from any of the events and technological pressures that have changed society and will continue to do so, volatile over time: the entire infosphere is returned and rebounded. to the contingent reality of each of us so that it is now impossible to ignore, and perhaps even control, the phenomenon that has developed, to the point of bringing out new realities that interact with the real world making it virtual. As we all know, all this generates an infinite spiral that translates men into users, managed by as many algorithms.
The complexity of our mission and the heterogeneity of the tasks we have set ourselves always require new contributions. If you like our proposal, feel free to write to us for reports, support or simply to personally enter the field with your personal contribution. We are always happy to welcome new friends; use the contact page to send us a private message.
The birth in the new world as the only possible is associated as the perfect other side of the coin with the multiverse, a possibility for all the different to exist and to be given simultaneously and within the world. This is a way to unhinge and virtualize every aspect of the individual, essentially to keep every aspect of everyone’s life under control.
Thus we react to the dystopian scenario of the present, telling things in a different way: we oppose the disarmament of criticism, with greater zeal, exploring other possibilities, looking at it from different points of view. Something that only a cohesive community can express, exposing a synergistic, creative and organic whole from the jumble of different opinions. Our idea is that the die is not cast at all and that indeed our mission can contribute to preserving the testimony of what must not be lost: hoping that each of our findings can help the reader to orient himself better or perhaps only to receive a new foothold to look beyond the narration of the illusionists.
The adventures we face in an attempt to reconstruct a critical vision of the world, lead us to assimilate different realities and different narratives as horizons of meaning to be explored and known, as if we were pioneers not of an achromatic reality made up of imperatives and “validity” but of a brilliant and radiant world expression of the creative research of explorers from Another World.
A. AW
