The reverse path of human logic: Malthusianism and Darwinism

Since the 1970s, the succession of relationships, agreements, summits and agendas has fueled an escalation towards the socio-economic paradigm shift, desired by predominant power groups. In these years the Club of Rome commissioned a study on the implications of progressive global growth from MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). The report, published in 1972, was collected in the book “The Limits to Growth“.

The authors calculated for the first time, through a computer simulation obtained using the World3 model, the limits of human growth on planet Earth. The report predicted a number of scenarios that would lead to a global economic collapse in the 21st century.

Five basic factors were examined: population growth, agricultural production, depletion of non-renewable resources, industrialization and pollution.

According to the authors, in order to avoid collapse and stabilize the economic system, it was necessary to apply a development model without growth that provided for the constancy of population and capital over time.

These thesis became the backbone of what was then called “Agenda 2030”.

So, from the 1972 Meadows Report commissioned by the Club of Rome, to the Brundtland Report of 1987 in which the notion of “sustainability” was introduced, by the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change (formerly Global Warming), at the same time as the approval of the 2030 Agenda, in Davos 2016 whose main theme was the 4th industrial revolution and its impact on society. All seasoned by the various UN Conferences in “Malthusian sauce”.

Thomas Malthus in An Essay on the Principle of Population (1798) – reference work of global power groups – identifies the main cause of poverty in the fact that the population tends to increase faster than the means of subsistence: while the population tends to increase in progression geometric, livelihoods tend to increase in arithmetic progression. To learn more take a look here.

According to Malthus, population growth can be counteracted by “repressive” restraints such as wars, epidemics and famines or by “preventive” restraints such as moral restriction which consists in the voluntary limitation of births through sexual abstinence and delay in marriages. Measures aimed above all – or rather exclusively – for the poorer classes.

In 1819, Malthus was elected a member of the Royal Society and two years later he became a member of the Political Economy Club. In 1824, he was elected as one of the 10 royal members of the Royal Society of Literature. Malthus was also one of the co-founders of the Statistical Society of London in 1834.

But let’s go back to times closer to our days, moving to the USA. Some of America’s leading billionaires met privately on May 5, 2009, in the presidential room of Rockefeller University (NY). The purpose of this meeting was to give direction to their power, in order to slow down world population growth, seen as a “potentially disastrous threat, environmental, social and industrial”. The meeting also covered public health and education issues.

This meeting, defined by some as Good Club, was organized at the push of the most influential person in the world, Bill Gates, also thanks to the collaboration of Warren Buffet – a well-known speculative investor – and of course David Rockefeller. The public goal, with blatantly Hollywood traits, was once again “saving the world”.

The meeting was attended by the then Mayor of New York Michael Bloomberg, the philanthropist and financier George Soros, the former CEO of Lehman Brothers and co-founder of the Blackstone group Peter G. Peterson, former Cisco Systems president John Morgridge and his wife Tashia, real estate speculator Eli Broad and his wife Edythe, media mogul Ted Turner and popular presenter Oprah Winfrey.

• May 18, 2009 “Secret Meeting of World’s Richest People Held in New York” link – Irish Central.
• May 23, 2009 “What Buffett and Gates Discussed at Secret Conference” link – Irish Central.
• May 24, 2009 “Billionaire Club in Bid to Curb Overpopulation” link – The Sunday Times, UK.
• May 26, 2009 “Billionaires Try to Shrink World’s Population, Report Says” link – The Wall Street Journal
• May 30, 2009 “They’re Called the Good Club – and They Want to Save the World” link – The Guardian.

It then happened that on June 11, 2009, we imagine at this point it all happened by chance, Dr. Margaret Chan, WHO Director General, announced the first pandemic (Phase 6) of the 21st century: the A/H1N1 flu, called swine flu.

But let us return to the most immediate relevance, in decidedly more complex and problematic times. The new report from the World Economic Forum, published on February 15, 2022, calls for a multistakeholder approach to move towards a trusted digital agency for a safer and more inclusive online world.

On p. 24 of the report also refers to vaccination passports which for the World Economic Forum represent by their very nature “a form of digital identity”. Just to give a conclusive sign to this whole path of modern history: does a globalist agenda exist or does not exist? Where do they want to throw man, through this ferocious push of a technocratic neo-Malthusianism? You can view the document mentioned here