With a reassuring and clean face, we can also imagine him in the guise of a lifeguard assistant or a real estate agent, this versatile character, a bit banker and a bit inventor, represents in the eyes of the general public the creative genius capable of breaking the mold and surprise with punctuality. Not wanting to crudely break all these patterns of expectations, because who knows … maybe they are well founded … but let’s try to better understand who Elon Musk is, out of the spotlight, and what the true story of him seems to be.
Updating the story a few days ago, the “Elon Musk” anomaly, according to what we read in the various media outlets, essentially boils down to criticism of politically correct censorship, “woke” ideology and its protest against the measures restrictive during the first pandemic period, that is in 2020. On the other hand, there is the whole mass, not of simple declarations, but of companies and entrepreneurial activities, wonderfully inserted in the world of globalist oligarchies. So it is possible to raise the suspicion that an “Elon Musk” version of free-speech is only assigned the role of “good cop” and that the “Elon Musk” version of the anti-lockdown protests was simply serving the interests of his main company – Tesla – wanting to maintain a fruitful relationship with the President Donald Trump, harshly criticized by him, however, regarding climate change and environmental policies. So, who’s Elon Musk?
Musk calls himself “half Republican and half Democratic”, he has funded candidates from both parties and his companies have received nearly $ 5 billion in state subsidies since 2015.
Politics and public money for Elon Musk
But, who’s Elon Musk? Already a simple chronology of his entrepreneurial adventures is very significant: Elon Musk starts from the “third industrial revolution”, moves on to the central element of the ideology of the globalist oligarchies, which is environmentalism 2.0, and arrives at the dark side of Great Reset, artificial intelligences and their integration with human bodies and brains. In this sense, Elon Musk is the entrepreneur of transhumanism, just as Yuval Noah Harari is its theorist and Klaus Schwab its spokesperson.
According to the official biographies, Musk begins his bright career at the age of 24, which according to Forbes will lead him to become one of the richest men in the world, even if he is not really a businessman, but an engineer and an “inventor”. He founded his first company, thanks to the mysteriously loaned capital to him and his brother from what he himself defines as “a group of angel investors in Silicon Valley”. The angel investor – or business angel – is a private investor who decides to risk capital in a nascent company – a start-up – by becoming a partner. It is unclear why these Silicon Valley investors have decided to entrust their capital to a 24-year-old boy, raised in a suburb of Johannesburg, bullied at school, who moved to Canada to study against the wishes of an abusive father. The start-up was Zip2 and produced software to provide online city guides to newspapers. Equally mysterious is the fact that even the New York Times decides to enter into a contract with the young Musk’s company.
Four years later, Elon Musk sells Zip2 and with the proceeds he founded X.Com, a financial services and online payments company from which PayPal was born. PayPal is now one of the strategic partners of the WEF and its co-founder was a “Young global leader” of Klaus Schwab’s stable. It is also one of the “winning capitalist” companies of the pandemic era.
Another three years pass – we are now in the new millennium and precisely in 2002 – and Elon Musk launches into one of his most evocative enterprises, Space-X, of which he is also CEO. As we read in an article on the WEF website, SpaceX is involved, among other things, with the construction of rockets capable of transporting humans to Mars.
The future is in Chinese hands, and it breathes on Mars
In perspective, Musk’s would not be a whim for the super-rich, but a mass transfer to the “red planet”, to prevent worrying levels of “global warming”, that is in the context of an Earth depopulation plan following a new world war. “A permanent settlement on Mars”, the article continues, “would reduce the risk of climate change or that a nuclear war, bioterrorism, collision with an asteroid could wipe out our species”. SpaceX, in anticipation of these future horizons, deals with more immediately concrete things, such as launching satellites and sending refueling missions to space stations and also has contracts with NASA and the Pentagon.
Moreover, today Musk’s name is associated above all with Tesla, a leading company in the production of electric cars of which he became CEO in 2004. It is with Tesla that Musk becomes the most important man in the Green transition and it is always with Tesla that owes a large part of its economic fortune. Tesla herself makes us understand that it would be very hasty, in the light of what has just been said especially about SpaceX, to believe that Musk is simply a character linked to the big capital of Silicon Valley, NASA, the Pentagon, that is to the USA. The exponential growth in the sale of electric cars – therefore in Tesla’s turnover – is essentially linked to the immense Chinese market (in the US electric cars were only 4% in 2020) and it is the same Chinese market that can guarantee Tesla’s future. . As previously reported, we also know that Elon Musk is neither the founder nor, as some claim, a co-founder of Tesla, having entered it in 2004, through a capitalization operation, and having become the largest shareholder at the time.
Passing over the other companies founded by Musk, it is 2015-2016 that marks a new decisive step with the foundation of OpenAI, followed a few months later by that of Neuralink.
Musk thus makes his triumphal entry into the Fourth Industrial Revolution and does so, as for aerospace companies, with an ostentatious democratic posture. The purpose of OpenAI would in fact be to make artificial intelligences accessible to all, to avoid that they are only the field of action of those who are merely looking for profits, to oppose governments that wish to use them for the purpose of controlling citizens and power and transform them. in a great benefit to humanity. Someone must have thought of sweet emotions, while painting the portrait of this character for the general public.
Then there is a fairly recent news, relating to the acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk, for an amount equal to 44 billion dollars (!!!). Who’s Elon Musk? After this acquisition he clearly became the spearhead of the defenders of freedom – but only of the one not silenced by law. Now this acquisition seems to have been put on stand-by, for a check on the real value represented by the users. Elon Musk has in fact rightly requested a verification on the fake accounts of this platform. Twitter claims they are 5%, so Musk said he wanted to carry out a due diligence just to ascertain and have a more precise response on this declaration.
The great beast of Great Reset
Except that, in this field, Musk’s most significant and disturbing project is not OpenAI, but Neuralink. Neuralink deals with “neurotechnologies” and, in particular, with “neural interfaces” to be implanted in the human brain. The WEF enthusiastically welcomed the birth of this start-up, underlining that in this way Musk set out to provide our brains with extra memory, a bit like the external memory of computers. Behind this fascinating facade, however, one can guess something else: we are really at the hard core of transhumanism, and it is from this point that it becomes possible to frame Musk’s enterprise in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the globalist project – the dark side of transhumanism. A vile, banal and inexperienced work of bio-technogenic engineering, as the transhuman “accountants” would have us believe, justified by philosophical sophisms used to sweeten a distorted and dissonant conception of humanity. Deformed vision, where the human being is considered disabled: whose “imperfections” sanctioned by transhuman technoscience would require, according to this vision, technological prostheses and orthoses to correct these presumed existential limitations, arbitrarily rendered as such by “thinkers” too lazy to stop to reflect through a thought worthy of the name: they do not think but reason, and in this there is a lot of difference. Stay tuned, because we will talk about it often. Transcending the primitive condition of Homo Sapiens means becoming what we basically already are, that is, Beings, Human Beings: this is the authentic way for the improvement of Humanity. It is a refined “alchemical” work that does not consist so much in transcending as in combining the finite forces of Animal Nature with the infinite potential of the Human Soul, forces and powers that inhabit us.